Timeline for Increase processing use of Digital Signal Processor
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 4, 2018 at 21:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 6, 2018 at 9:03 | comment | added | jaskij | Ask your EEs if there is anything like built-in linear voltage regulators or other things which you can use to heat up the SoC apart from the CPU. | |
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 6, 2018 at 20:29 | answer | added | robert bristow-johnson | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 6, 2018 at 16:34 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 16:00 | comment | added | Berin Loritsch | The most common way to heat up a processor is to have it perform complicated math without any breaks. I.e. no interrupts, just a range of functions to hit as much of the silicon as possible. Floating point and integer arithmetic combined in the appropriate mix to exercise those units in the DSP as much as possible. Doing a simple spin wait doesn't really hit all the functions of the device so you are limited on how hot you can make it. | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 15:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 7, 2018 at 15:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Apr 7, 2018 at 14:23 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 8, 2018 at 12:55 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Feb 6, 2018 at 12:32 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 29, 2018 at 15:22 | comment | added | nikhil_kotian | It seems you already have a background worker keeping the CPU busy. This effectively means its running at 100%. There are other ways of increasing the temperature profile. It may depend on your processor, I/O accesses or memory fetches and memory interfaces. Please shed light on this if you want more details. | |
Jan 7, 2018 at 10:33 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 8, 2017 at 9:58 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
S Nov 8, 2017 at 9:40 | history | suggested | user1118321 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanations of a few initializations
|
Nov 8, 2017 at 6:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 8, 2017 at 9:40 | |||||
Nov 7, 2017 at 21:06 | comment | added | candied_orange | Please define your alphabet soup. Forcing us to guess is fairly rude. Digital Signal Processor, Time Division Multiplexer, and Infinite Impulse Response are not exactly common abbreviations here. | |
Nov 7, 2017 at 19:38 | answer | added | John R. Strohm | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 7, 2017 at 19:30 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 8, 2017 at 6:12 | |||||
Nov 7, 2017 at 19:28 | history | asked | user2982010 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |