Timeline for Isn't keeping the master branch intact essential for collaborating?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 17, 2019 at 12:47 | vote | accept | Marcus Ekström | ||
S Nov 12, 2019 at 4:06 | history | edited | Theraot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar fixed, improved readability
|
S Nov 12, 2019 at 4:06 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar fixed, improved readability
|
Nov 11, 2019 at 16:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 12, 2019 at 4:06 | |||||
Nov 11, 2019 at 10:57 | comment | added | Pieter B | If your process allows for a non-working master, your process is wrong. | |
Nov 11, 2019 at 9:05 | answer | added | tripleee | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 10:36 | answer | added | Flater | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 9:00 | answer | added | Doc Brown | timeline score: 8 | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 8:33 | comment | added | Doc Brown | @JeremyHunt: fixed. | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 8:32 | history | edited | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Title improved, question improved to make it less broad.
|
Nov 10, 2019 at 7:22 | comment | added | gnat | see On discussions and why they don't make good questions | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 3:55 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 18, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
Nov 10, 2019 at 3:37 | comment | added | Jeremy Hunt | Hi, Marcus. Your title question is probably too broad. Whether your branches should always be in a working state has been answered before on here a few times before -- but you are specifically asking about why it isn't discussed in many articles? (Isn't it stated or at least implied in all the ones you linked?) | |
Nov 10, 2019 at 1:40 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 16, 2019 at 4:25 | |||||
Nov 10, 2019 at 1:36 | history | asked | Marcus Ekström | CC BY-SA 4.0 |