Timeline for Scaling inserting related optional objects to your collection
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2020 at 15:13 | comment | added | Daniel M | @Ewan I moved onto that next question, add questions/comments there, please. | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 15:11 | comment | added | Ewan | its less ugly, just as dynamic and they are gona have to rewrite the add function in any case? | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 14:35 | comment | added | Daniel M | @Ewan Because it's ugly and it's not dynamic. Another developer cannot dynamically add his own stuff, he'd have to re-write this original code. I asked the next question about this in here: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/403796/… | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 13:46 | comment | added | Ewan | why check at all, just add null | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 13:39 | comment | added | Daniel M | @Ewan Right, but the question is how do I do this at scale? I'll end up with a lot of parameters and a lot of checks. | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 13:25 | answer | added | Ewan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 12:51 | comment | added | Ewan | surely you should add a null style if not supplied in order to maintain the overall class | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 12:06 | history | edited | Daniel M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 21 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2020 at 12:05 | comment | added | Daniel M | Fixed. Adds to the package. | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 9:40 | comment | added | Ewan | doesnt this overwrite the contents of packages[$name]? | |
| Jan 14, 2020 at 1:52 | history | edited | Daniel M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2020 at 1:15 | history | asked | Daniel M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |