Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
May 29, 2020 at 21:58 comment added Bryan Oakley @BKB: "The issue is, when a standup is run, as prescribed, it puts the developers with long tasks at a disadvantage, since your updates are always boring." - if they are doing scrum properly, there is no disadvantage. It shouldn't matter that an update is boring or exciting or something inbetween. There should be no penalties for saying "I'm still working on the same problem", thus no incentive for taking smaller stories.
May 29, 2020 at 21:26 comment added BKB I feel like you're ignoring the fact that the OP is doing scrum properly. They are having stand-ups each day, as prescribed. They are giving status updates: what did I do yesterday, and what will I do today, as prescribed. Then the scrum master moves the tickets to their appropriate status, as prescribed. The issue is, when a standup is run, as prescribed, it puts the developers with long tasks at a disadvantage, since your updates are always boring. Thus, there's an incentive to take smaller stories, to show progress, or provide very detailed updates, to impress people.
May 24, 2020 at 6:03 comment added Bryan Oakley @MartinMaat: I've seen scrum teams that were "doing the right thing" before scrum that became better with scrum.
May 24, 2020 at 5:41 comment added Martin Maat "If everyone is capable and doing the right thing, things will be OK". Yes, if everyone were doing the right thing you will succeed no matter what method you are following. But that is not the point, the point is whether the method will help or has some issues of its own that will work against the end result. "You should not do that" is not a falsification of the statement there are some negative incentives in the method itself.
May 24, 2020 at 4:59 history edited Bryan Oakley CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body
May 24, 2020 at 4:53 history answered Bryan Oakley CC BY-SA 4.0