Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25, 2021 at 18:30 comment added DJClayworth All of the things you recommend are absolutely things that a good Scrum approach would also recommend. Ownership, Functioning as a Team, Self-Organization and Flexible Metrics are (or should be) taught as part of your introduction to Scrum. If you are not doing these you are doing Scrum completely wrong, at the level of someone who says they are "driving a car" but the car has four legs and goes moo. If you are experiencing this get some Scrum training.
S Jul 2, 2020 at 1:16 history suggested Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_(software_development)>, <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whom#Usage_notes>, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman>, <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/themselves#Pronoun>, and <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/referee#Noun>).
Jun 30, 2020 at 9:15 review Suggested edits
S Jul 2, 2020 at 1:16
Jun 8, 2020 at 7:43 comment added Qiulang 邱朗 Check my update and also my book review here amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/…
May 29, 2020 at 21:14 comment added BKB Scrum / Agile advocates repeat the Not Real Scrum fallacy because it's explicitly taught in Scrum / Agile training classes. I've been through several programs and every one of them has a section dedicated to "ScrumBut" or similar. It's there explicitly to teach people how to deflect the inevitable criticism of Agile. There's a lot of money to be made by the consultants to teach companies to be "agile". The most effective Agile team I've been on was one where the scrum master filled out a fake Jira board for management.
May 28, 2020 at 7:41 comment added Norch The impact of Scrum on team morale is often not considered in the criticisms. +1
May 26, 2020 at 15:22 history answered KiraraVS CC BY-SA 4.0