Timeline for Is microservices architecture a good candidate for a pipeline?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2020 at 8:50 | answer | added | s.lg | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 21, 2020 at 7:46 | history | edited | Deepak Mishra | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Oct 20, 2020 at 19:40 | history | edited | Deepak Mishra |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 20, 2020 at 15:49 | history | edited | Deepak Mishra |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 20, 2020 at 13:49 | answer | added | sevensevens | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 13:27 | history | edited | Deepak Mishra |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 20, 2020 at 11:50 | answer | added | skott | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 11:39 | comment | added | Deepak Mishra | @PeterCsala Yes, that would be needed but if I use some sort of "Quality of service" within the server to distribute resources, I won't have to think of those concerns. | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 11:20 | comment | added | Peter Csala | Depending on the your deployment setup the network latency can be negligible compared to the computation need. You need to measure to be sure. But you also have to prepare yourself to apply some sort of resilience strategy to overcome of the transient network failures. | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 11:17 | comment | added | Peter Csala | Using a simple message broker to communicate between microservices is a good start but most of the time is not enough. If the computation in different services aren't totally independent then what would you do if ServiceN fails? How do you coordinate the ServiceN-1, ServiceN-2 ... rollback / apply compensation action / error handling flow? That's the area where orchestration (for example via Saga pattern) is needed. | |
Oct 20, 2020 at 10:47 | history | asked | Deepak Mishra | CC BY-SA 4.0 |