Timeline for What about Utility-Classes, but without hard dependencies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2021 at 11:45 | vote | accept | Diggi55 | ||
| May 14, 2021 at 16:39 | comment | added | Greg Burghardt | @ArneBurmeister: definitely agreed. Even more to that point, complex utility methods may indicate you are missing a class or abstraction. It could be a design smell worth investigating. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 16:34 | comment | added | Arne Burmeister | In principal I agree but the utility methods must not extend a certain complexity! Otherwise your unit tests of units using it always have deal with that complexity and maybe testing it over and over again! | |
| May 14, 2021 at 15:36 | history | edited | Greg Burghardt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed grammar and missing word.
|
| May 13, 2021 at 14:44 | history | answered | Greg Burghardt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |