Timeline for Is there a way to make Rust code more succinct?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2021 at 17:27 | vote | accept | Zomagk | ||
| May 30, 2021 at 16:54 | comment | added | amon | @Deduplicator Good point. In my experience, Rust programs are more succinct as a whole than C++ programs for a variety of factors (no headers, better libraries, better string handling) but honestly C++ would come ahead in this example, e.g. because C++ struct literals don't require type names. Of course, typical C++ wouldn't try to emulate named parameters in the first place. | |
| May 30, 2021 at 16:52 | history | edited | amon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I also like C++. Mark joking around more clearly.
|
| May 30, 2021 at 16:39 | comment | added | Deduplicator | "Still better than C++, though!" Is this specific example of Rust better than C++, especially in regards to succinctness, the aspect OP mentioned? I don't think so. Might the whole Rust package be better? Maybe, I don't want to start a holy war here. | |
| May 30, 2021 at 16:04 | history | answered | amon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |