Skip to main content
added 444 characters in body
Source Link
Christophe
  • 80.6k
  • 11
  • 132
  • 199

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of themaking data being recoveredrecovery improbable. AndBut improbable is not impossible and the riskdifference between the two depends on the means that the potential recoverer has at its disposals and the value of the recovered information has.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. HoweverWriting only 0 is for forensic experts like if you put a blank sheet of paper above printed page: it may be difficult to read, but with the right light you can start to guess the content. Moreover, very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient and skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads ( using microscopic imagery of the surface combined with image analysis, two scientific fields that have made plenty of progress in the last years).

Another example are solid state disks, that. These usually try to avoid to physically overwritingoverwrite data,. SSD try to reduce reuse of storage elements. SSD because they are limited on the number of physical rewrites itthey can reliably deal with, so they. So drives are designed to perform logical rewrites elsewhere whenever possible, to increase their life time. You never really overwrite anything if you just overwrite a single file on an SSD. You can be sure of an overwrite only if you force the SD to reuse all available space, for example by overwriting the full SSD.

This being said, why trying to write such a program when there is already sdelete. and similar products that were designed by experts in this field?

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals and the value the recovered information has.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to avoid physically overwriting data, to reduce reuse of storage elements. SSD are limited on the number of physical rewrites it can reliably deal with, so they are designed to perform logical rewrites elsewhere whenever possible, to increase their life time. You never really overwrite anything if you just overwrite a single file. You can be sure of an overwrite only if you force the SD to reuse all available space, for example by overwriting the full SSD.

This being said, why trying to write such a program when there is already sdelete. and similar products that were designed by experts in this field?

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) making data recovery improbable. But improbable is not impossible and the difference between the two depends on the means that the potential recoverer has at its disposals and the value of the recovered information.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. Writing only 0 is for forensic experts like if you put a blank sheet of paper above printed page: it may be difficult to read, but with the right light you can start to guess the content. Moreover, very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient and skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads ( using microscopic imagery of the surface combined with image analysis, two scientific fields that have made plenty of progress in the last years).

Another example are solid state disks. These usually try to avoid to physically overwrite data. SSD try to reduce reuse of storage elements because they are limited on the number of physical rewrites they can reliably deal with. So drives are designed to perform logical rewrites elsewhere whenever possible, to increase life time. You never really overwrite anything if you just overwrite a single file on an SSD. You can be sure of an overwrite only if you force the SD to reuse all available space, for example by overwriting the full SSD.

This being said, why trying to write such a program when there is already sdelete. and similar products that were designed by experts in this field?

added 645 characters in body
Source Link
Christophe
  • 80.6k
  • 11
  • 132
  • 199

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals and the value the recovered information has.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to avoid physically overwriting data, to reduce reuse of storage elements. SSD are limited on the number of physical rewrites it can reliably deal with, so they are designed to perform logical rewrites elsewhere whenever possible, to increase their life time. You never really overwrite anything unlessif you managejust overwrite a single file. You can be sure of an overwrite only if you force the SD to fillreuse all available space, for example by overwriting the diskfull SSD.

This being said, why trying to write such a program when there is already sdelete. and similar products that were designed by experts in this field?

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to reduce reuse of storage elements to increase their life time. You never overwrite anything unless you manage to fill the disk.

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals and the value the recovered information has.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to avoid physically overwriting data, to reduce reuse of storage elements. SSD are limited on the number of physical rewrites it can reliably deal with, so they are designed to perform logical rewrites elsewhere whenever possible, to increase their life time. You never really overwrite anything if you just overwrite a single file. You can be sure of an overwrite only if you force the SD to reuse all available space, for example by overwriting the full SSD.

This being said, why trying to write such a program when there is already sdelete. and similar products that were designed by experts in this field?

added 444 characters in body
Source Link
Christophe
  • 80.6k
  • 11
  • 132
  • 199

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals.

A concrete example is about hard drives: magnetic remanence allowsmagnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal tocould still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to reduce reuse of storage elements to increase their life time. You never overwrite anything unless you manage to fill the disk.

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals.

A concrete example is about hard drives: magnetic remanence allows very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of skilled staff at their disposal to recover data.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to reduce reuse of storage elements to increase their life time. You never overwrite anything unless you manage to fill the disk.

You can very difficultly obtain a true irrecoverable deletion of data. This is not related to algorithms but to physical properties of storage media.

You can only hope to reduce the risk (or opportunity) of the data being recovered. And the risk depends on the means that the recoverer has at its disposals.

A concrete example is hard drives: magnetic remanence creates a risk of undesired traces around the magnetic track. Writing random data several times reduces significantly the risk. However very powerful people having atomic microscopes and plenty of patient skilled staff at their disposal could still recover (at disproportionate costs) some data that you could no longer recover with ordinary reading heads.

Another example are solid state disks, that try to reduce reuse of storage elements to increase their life time. You never overwrite anything unless you manage to fill the disk.

Source Link
Christophe
  • 80.6k
  • 11
  • 132
  • 199
Loading