Timeline for OO vs FP: What is a good approach to understanding if heavy wrapper classes should be used?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2023 at 13:27 | comment | added | panlex | lol that is an esoteric term and I guess the latest buzzwords don't have an explicit definition. Someone should make an urbandictionary.com solution for this. Yeah I think scalability can go two ways - parallelized and distributed. Sounds like the answer is up to me as the opinionated expert. | |
| Aug 28, 2023 at 15:53 | comment | added | Doc Brown | @panlex: well, you were the one who wrote "better scalability" - to be honest, I didn't really buy this. I think we would have to start by defining what kind of scalability we are talking of - scalability for using more CPUs in parallel, or scalability in terms of having more developers work in parallel on the system? I guess you mean the former. | |
| Aug 28, 2023 at 13:55 | comment | added | panlex | thanks. Maybe what I'm asking since I haven't seen this explicitly, is in what situation would the supposed scalability of the functional approach be meaningful? If I were to add dozens of types that needed the transform etc. I come back to: Simple things can be functionalized, complex capabilities are better represented in encapsulated form. Seen strong tendency to use encapsulation inside scientific computing applications. | |
| Aug 26, 2023 at 15:06 | history | edited | candied_orange | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Idioms, the well worn paths to understanding.
|
| Aug 26, 2023 at 8:50 | history | edited | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Aug 26, 2023 at 7:56 | history | answered | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 4.0 |