Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7, 2023 at 17:19 history edited IntelliData CC BY-SA 4.0
Updated title to reflect latest edit
Nov 7, 2023 at 6:59 comment added Doc Brown @IntelliData: any reason why you changed the content of your question without editing the title, so both don't match any more?
Nov 6, 2023 at 20:01 answer added Richard H. Nguyen timeline score: 3
Nov 6, 2023 at 19:25 history edited IntelliData CC BY-SA 4.0
Corrected the question; should not be about vanilla JS, I meant to ask about manual HTML/CSS vs SSG.
Nov 6, 2023 at 19:23 comment added IntelliData @Greg Burghardt My apologoies, I misspoke; I should rephrase: I meant a site built manually with HTML/CSS.
Nov 6, 2023 at 15:27 review Close votes
Nov 13, 2023 at 3:08
Nov 6, 2023 at 14:45 comment added Greg Burghardt The premise of this question doesn't make sense to me. The question is phrased as if plain JavaScript is a substitute for a static site generator. I mean, you could get it to work, but that's not really that use case for JavaScript.
Nov 5, 2023 at 22:45 comment added amon Say you're trying to create a blog. You write a webpage with one article. Then another. Then a frontpage with a list of items. Then you want to change the theme. You could edit all of the pages. That's doable for only three, but quickly gets of of hand. So you want a content management system (CMS) that lets you separate themes/templates from the actual content. You can't do that just with JS on the frontend (unless you're creating a SPA, but that has some problems of its own). A static site generator is simple, secure, and scalable because you just serve HTML files, no databases needed.
Nov 5, 2023 at 21:47 answer added Hans-Martin Mosner timeline score: 0
Nov 5, 2023 at 21:24 history asked IntelliData CC BY-SA 4.0