Timeline for How far can you push Object Oriented Programming?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12 at 11:51 | comment | added | Ewan | Yeah, you can push OOP as far as you like you just flip the way you call functions. I think this question is just a continuation of the argument on the previous one | |
| May 11 at 23:24 | comment | added | Filip Milovanović | Not a thing to do with general-purpose data structures, but for the sake of the argument, yeah a getter free design would look something like that (though you could argue this is not exactly a hash table anymore). You would not encapsulate the action (by which I presume you mean make it entirely internal to the class) - as that's a very different design. Passing in an action is just dependency injection (it could also be an object) - you'd do this sort of thing if your class needs to call something, but cannot know what that something is. But again, not how hash tables are conceptualized. | |
| May 11 at 22:27 | history | answered | Ccm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |