I have less to none experience on philosophical concepts of OOP (that for me refers to object oriented programming) and when facing this kind of context I try to correlate with real life where objects are inert beings that stay where and how they are placed by external forces (forces in physical sense), their internal state is unknown to outsiders that are unable even to deduct it from their appearance, hence it is not possible to do anything with objects without using force (again in physical sense, mechanical sense more specific).

So...

How far can you push Object Oriented Programming?

Until building a beautiful inert system useless without something that animates it, thought at least would be beautiful, delighting every presence around it. What would be a database without read access? Pardon the syrupyness.

I have less to none experience on philosophical concepts of OOP (that for me refers to object oriented programming) and when facing this kind of context I try to correlate with real life where objects are inert beings that stay where and how they are placed by external forces (forces in physical sense), their internal state is unknown to outsiders that are unable even to deduct it from their appearance, hence it is not possible to do anything with objects without using force (again in physical sense, mechanical sense more specific).

So...

How far can you push Object Oriented Programming?

...until building a beautiful inert system useless without something that animates it, though at least would be beautiful, delighting every presence around it. What would be a database without read access? Pardon the syrupyness.