Timeline for Help with optimizing virtual method
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23 at 19:08 | comment | added | Christophe | As far as I know, the current optimizers are already able to remove virtual calls if the type can be known. And for sure, from performance point of view, the free function with the pointer argument and a non-virtual member function will make absolutely no difference and generate almost the same code. | |
| Oct 23 at 18:56 | comment | added | Christophe | When you say inline, you mean in reality a free aka non-member function, isn't it ? The question is then why the base class had an abstract member in the first place... | |
| Oct 23 at 14:18 | vote | accept | Nick | ||
| Oct 23 at 14:03 | comment | added | Nick | see my answer to the question | |
| Oct 23 at 11:41 | comment | added | Nick | inline_f(this, args) = can you give me an example, because I do not understand what exactly you mean? | |
| Oct 23 at 11:32 | history | answered | gnasher729 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |