Timeline for Unit Testing: Should we care about distinguishing between Mocks and Stubs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2011 at 0:03 | vote | accept | mjhilton | ||
| Apr 13, 2011 at 6:37 | answer | added | KeesDijk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 6:07 | answer | added | Newtopian | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 5:42 | comment | added | k3b |
+1 after reading the examples for the nSubstitute library i was impressed how simple and clear the creation of fake objects can become compared to Rhino. May be your question should be something similar to Are we loosing anything if we dont have to care if it is a mock or a stub.
|
|
| Apr 13, 2011 at 5:35 | answer | added | refro | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 2:33 | comment | added | Steven A. Lowe | Your stub will be publicly mocked, regardless of what you call it. | |
| Apr 13, 2011 at 2:10 | history | edited | mjhilton |
Added .NET tag
|
|
| Apr 13, 2011 at 2:03 | history | asked | mjhilton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |