Timeline for Do libraries and frameworks swing more on the GPL or MIT side?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2010 at 2:16 | comment | added | pbreitenbach | jblu makes the case against GPL. If people have to pay to use it, they are obviously less likely to use it in the first place. Usage is oxygen for frameworks. | |
| Nov 10, 2010 at 0:40 | comment | added | TRiG | Surprisingly enough, Richard Stallman approves of the practise of selling exceptions to the GPL. fsf.org/blogs/rms/selling-exceptions | |
| Sep 29, 2010 at 4:55 | comment | added | Frank Shearar | Thanks for pointing out the flip side of the MIT licence. Yes, if you want to attach conditions to what you give away, then yes, GPL might well be what you want. | |
| Sep 28, 2010 at 22:55 | history | answered | jblue | CC BY-SA 2.5 |