Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 7, 2011 at 0:21 comment added Waquo MPL and LGPL seem way to permissive for Lea's needs.
Jun 6, 2011 at 23:44 history migrated from stackoverflow.com (revisions)
Jun 6, 2011 at 23:10 comment added Tomasz Kowalczyk This is very good point - I'm not a lawyer, so I've answered this with my knowledge. As I said - if you want to be 100% certain, ask lawyer, not programmer.
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:58 comment added Mark H Creative Commons shouldn't be used for software, because it doesn't define what work it is covering. (It makes no reference to code/object files or anything). It also does not cover licensing of any patents that may be used in the software.
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:53 comment added Tomasz Kowalczyk This does not mean that it is not used. As someone reminded here - if you need to be 100% sure, ask a lawyer. From my [programmer's] experience you'll be fine with CC. Other copyleft licenses require you to "free the code for everyone", which is not suitable for you.
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:50 comment added Lea Hayes @Tomasz Just read on Wikipedia: 'Creative Commons does not recommend the use of Creative Commons licenses for software.'
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:49 comment added Tomasz Kowalczyk You're welcome. Upvote / acceptance will be appreciated as well. :)
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:48 comment added Lea Hayes @Tomasz Thanks, I wasn't aware that share-alike attribution could be used for non-media (photos/text)
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:45 comment added Tomasz Kowalczyk Updated my answer.
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:43 comment added Lea Hayes @Tomasz I need to make sure that it is impossible for somebody to download my project re-brand it and pass it off as their own. Basically stop them from stealing the show. GPL / LGPL would allow anybody to steal the show (unless there is another way of protecting that) I haven't come across MPL before so I will look into that.
Jun 6, 2011 at 22:40 history answered Tomasz Kowalczyk CC BY-SA 3.0