Timeline for What are your favorite version control systems?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2011 at 1:38 | comment | added | Warren P | What drives me nuts is that people seem to want to stick on "standardizing" on something awful, instead of using something lovely, amazing, and great. I am trying, with no luck, to get people to even care about the question, "what should we use?". Sigh. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 21:37 | comment | added | Gary Willoughby | Mercurial is pretty sweet. Me and my team have been using it for about 2 months and it's a breath of fresh air compared to SVN. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 21:04 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki | ||
| Dec 13, 2010 at 13:38 | history | edited | epotter | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
improved the formatting
|
| Dec 13, 2010 at 12:57 | comment | added | user131 | +1, I suggest making Mercurial bold and bigger (as Gaurav did in his answer) | |
| Oct 12, 2010 at 3:21 | comment | added | Dean Harding | I prefer Mercurial simply because TortoiseHg is more mature than TortoiseGit :-) (the whole experience on Windows is much better in Mercurial as well) | |
| Sep 16, 2010 at 19:06 | comment | added | Seun Osewa | Mercurial is sweet if you're using Netbeans. the IDE integration is perfect. | |
| Sep 5, 2010 at 5:11 | comment | added | TheLQ | I've got to try out Mercurial some time since I've already tried 2 of the big 3. And since Google Code supports it... | |
| Sep 5, 2010 at 1:58 | history | answered | epotter | CC BY-SA 2.5 |