Timeline for Handling deleted users - separate or same table?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2011 at 23:31 | comment | added | Mike Sherrill 'Cat Recall' | It might help to stop thinking of them as deleted (which is not true) and start thinking of their account as canceled (which is true). | |
| Nov 29, 2011 at 23:07 | answer | added | Mike Nakis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 21, 2011 at 4:11 | answer | added | Aaronaught | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 21, 2011 at 1:08 | history | edited | Alan Beats | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 330 characters in body
|
| Jul 20, 2011 at 13:39 | history | edited | FrustratedWithFormsDesigner |
retag
|
|
| Jul 20, 2011 at 13:35 | answer | added | Jesse C. Slicer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 13:16 | answer | added | Andrey | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:43 | answer | added | Adrian Shum | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:40 | comment | added | keppla | @ChrisF: i was interested in the scope: does he want to keep books of only the users, or is there still some data attached (e.G. comments, payments, etc) | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:31 | comment | added | ChrisF♦ | @keppla - he mentions that: "historical book-keeping". | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:31 | comment | added | Sjoerd | This is called soft-delete. See also Deleting database records unpermenantley (soft-delete) | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:29 | answer | added | mczajk | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:28 | answer | added | ChrisF♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:22 | history | edited | ChrisF♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling
|
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:22 | answer | added | Péter Török | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:11 | comment | added | keppla | For what reasons do you keep the users? | |
| Jul 20, 2011 at 11:04 | history | asked | Alan Beats | CC BY-SA 3.0 |