Timeline for Getters and Setters in Functional Languages
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2011 at 8:48 | comment | added | user7043 | @dan_waterworth: Only if we read the "same" in "referentially transparent" as object identity. If the fact the underlying attribute is different makes it a call with different arguments (which is in line with most definitions of equality). This is ignoring another thread calling a setter and finishing it between the call to the getter and the getter finishing, but in that case you got more serious problems anyway. | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 | comment | added | dan_waterworth | @delnan, only if the attribute that it is reading is immutable. | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 6:19 | answer | added | Tyler | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 20:37 | answer | added | Casey Hawthorne | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 19:59 | vote | accept | ThaDon | ||
| Jul 27, 2011 at 18:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/96287482445967360 | ||
| Jul 27, 2011 at 18:22 | answer | added | Daniel C. Sobral | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 18:21 | comment | added | user7043 | Getters and setters have the object as parameter - even though it's usually implicit - so getters are referentially transparent. | |
| Jul 27, 2011 at 18:12 | history | edited | ThaDon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2011 at 18:06 | history | asked | ThaDon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |