Using macros to implement a generic vector (dynamic array) in C. Is this a good idea?

Question

So far I have only done personal projects at home. I hope to get involved in some open source project some time next year. The languages I that have been using the most are C and C++. I have used both languages for over a year and I feel like I have become quite proficient with both of them, but I really don't know which one I like better.

I personally like C because I think it is simple and elegant. To me C++ seems bloated many unnecessary features that just complicates the design process. Another reason to why I like to use plain C is because it seems to be more popular in the free and open-source software world.

The feature that I miss the most from C++ when I use plain C is probably the std::vector from STL (Standard Template Library).

I still haven't figured out how I should represent growing arrays in C. Up to this point I duplicated my memory allocation code all over the place in my projects. I do not like code duplication and I know that it is bad practice so this does not seems like a very good solution to me.

I thought about this problem yesterday and came up with the idea to implement a generic vector using preprocessor macros.

It looks like this:

int main()
{
    VECTOR_OF(int) int_vec;
    VECTOR_OF(double) dbl_vec;
    int i;

    VECTOR_INIT(int_vec);
    VECTOR_INIT(dbl_vec);

    for (i = 0; i < 100000000; ++i) {
        VECTOR_PUSH_BACK(int_vec, i);
        VECTOR_PUSH_BACK(dbl_vec, i);
    }

    for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
        printf("int_vec[%d] = %d\n", i, VECTOR_AT(int_vec, i));
        printf("dbl_vec[%d] = %f\n", i, VECTOR_AT(dbl_vec, i));
    }

    VECTOR_FREE(int_vec);
    VECTOR_FREE(dbl_vec);

    return 0;
}

It uses the same allocation rules as std::vector (the size starts as 1 and then doubles each time that is required).

To my surprise I found out that this code runs more than twice as fast as the same code written using std::vector and generates a smaller executable! (compiled with GCC and G++ using -O3 in both cases).

My question is:

• Would you recommend using this in a serious project?
• If not then I would like you to explain why and what a better alternative would be.

Answer 1

My question is: Would you recommend using this in a serious project?

Yes! Here is something that is mostly true about library functions: they necessarily have to be generally applicable in order to accommodate many users with different requirements. If you know the underlying algorithm, the library function is going to be larger and slower than your own implementation. Most of the time we don't care, because size and speed aren't an issue. However once speed does become an issue and the bottleneck is the library function (very often with library sorting algorithms), simply understanding the algorithm and writing something that works for you can result in dramatic speed improvements. I understand you discovered this in another way (reproducing a feature from std::vector in C) and aren't asking an optimization question. But it's worth mentioning that what you've learned will come in very handy in the future when working in Java, C++, etc. and you run into a speed bottleneck that crushes your project. This can happen often in computationally-intensive projects.