Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with rust
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 191781
Rust is a systems programming language focused on three goals: safety, speed, and concurrency. It maintains these goals without needing a garbage collector, making it a useful language for a number of use cases other languages aren't good at: embedding in other languages, programs with specific space and time requirements, and writing low-level code, like device drivers and operating systems.
10
votes
5
answers
799
views
Is it possible to programmatically evaluate safety for arbitrary code?
ensuring safety is a bit of a how-big-is-the-net problem, because, as proven by Rust's need for unsafe, there are some very reasonable programming ideas, like concurrency, that cannot be implemented in Rust … a practicality perspective (is it going to take the life of the universe), is it reasonable to imagine a program that takes arbitrary code in an arbitrary language and evaluates whether or not it's "Rust …
- 1,169