Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with c#
Search options not deleted
user 34360
C# is a multiparadigm, managed, garbage-collected object-oriented programming language created by Microsoft in parallel with the .NET platform
7
votes
What are good ways of balancing informative exceptions and clean code?
Microsoft seems to (via looking at the .NET source) sometimes use resource/Environment strings. For example, ParseDecimal:
throw new OverflowException(Environment.GetResourceString("Overflow_Decimal …
- 308
1
vote
What are good ways of balancing informative exceptions and clean code?
[note] I copied this from the question into an answer in case there are comments about it.
Move each exception into a method of the class, taking in any arguments that need the formatting.
private …
- 308
12
votes
8
answers
2k
views
What are good ways of balancing informative exceptions and clean code?
With our public SDK, we tend to want to give very informative messages about why an exception occurs. For example:
if (interfaceInstance == null)
{
string errMsg = string.Format(
"Con …
- 308