Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with mit-license
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 9113
MIT License is a free software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). If you intend to ask something about this license, CONSIDER NOT TO ASK HERE - instead, try Opensource.SE (https://opensource.stackexchange.com).
1
vote
What do I choose if I use the source code from a GPL2 project, and another source code from ...
If I have a project that uses source code from a GPL 2 licensed project, and another set of source code from an MIT licensed project, what do I license my whole project as?
Derived works fr …
- 214k
3
votes
Accepted
How to license application generated from boilerplate code?
IANAL, but the case you describe is IMHO similar to the distinction between licenses for individual modules of a software and the software "as a whole", as you often find them in open source software. …
- 214k
3
votes
Accepted
Does license have to be in text format?
If you are the author of your software's license, you can choose whatever format you want. If you want to pick an existing license, study the text if there is a requirement to keep it in the original …
- 214k
9
votes
What to do when using MIT-licensed code in a GPL-licensed project?
AFAIK, the typical GPL variants apply only to your work "as a whole", and the MIT license is "compatible" with GPL. That means, if parts of your program are under MIT license, that is fine, as long as …
- 214k
14
votes
Accepted
Changing license of personal GitHub repository
If you published code once under GPL, that version of your code is GPL code, that is nothing you can change again. Someone else (in fact, thousands of people) could have made a copy, that copy is unde …
- 214k
5
votes
Accepted
With source code lost, can the binary be released as MIT without it?
In every jurisdiction I know, the author or copyright holder of a software can pick whatever license they like, source code available or not. And nowhere in the MIT license does the term "source code" …
- 214k
4
votes
What are the options for licensing a code project with "license soup" in the sources?
Given the license soup described above, can I even release my code under a single license, or should/must each part of it (mine and everybody else's) have a separate license?
Both. GPLv3 re …
- 214k