Apparently I acoidentally downvoted this at some point and now can't change it. :(

Paste the commit hash and/or commit message into the tracker? This is just about indicating when something is done with a papertrail, right?

@veryfoolish StackExchange is already a genetic algorithm, the solvers are just so good we need to give them a new problem every iteration.

I think operation is fine, but the do method should be called "eval" or similar. Also, IValue eval(IValue a, IValue b) perhaps?

Blah. Minor changes would make this oddity so much more useful, if the usage was more like: -- fd = FTPdump(site, directory) -- for file in files: fd.upload(file)

@Aviv i think i'd say that's a case of "if your user removes the safty and triggerguard, it's no longer your fault that holstering the gun occasionally shoots them in the leg."

Why is this tagged python?

It sounds like you are just explaining one of the principles, the L one i think. For what It is it's ok but the question asked for a compare/contrast of two different principles. That's probably why someone downvoted it.

I agree, people working oueside a company have to take on certain org-like responsibilities, probably should others and can even more. Some might even have a dba or other name you could put down for it; for the rest you can make a standard name suffix [Jo Bort [Freelancer]] or flag /org type field for it.

I haven't seen what these histories look like but I'd think that having a clear display of merges being from externvl sources would be preferable in many cases?