Timeline for Should every service have its staging environment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 1, 2023 at 11:58 | comment | added | Ben Cottrell | Environments generally mirror the structure of an organisation. Assuming the split doesn't fundamentally change the way the business views the project (e.g. each service given to a separate team, separate product owners with their own budget, deadlines, release cycles, etc), there's unlikely to be any gain from also splitting the environments as well. Environment separation allows teams to be more independent of each other, so if there's still only one team/product then separate environments are unlikely to gain anything but adding a lot of complexity in needing to manage them. | |
Mar 31, 2023 at 14:12 | answer | added | S.D. | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 28, 2023 at 8:01 | answer | added | Laiv | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 27, 2023 at 8:49 | answer | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 26, 2023 at 18:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Feb 24, 2023 at 17:34 | answer | added | Ewan | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 24, 2023 at 15:07 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 1, 2023 at 3:03 | |||||
Feb 24, 2023 at 14:00 | history | asked | samdouble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |