Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with code-reviews
Search options not deleted
user 35394
This tag is for questions about the practice of code review and code walkthroughs. For reviews of existing, working code, please see http://codereview.stackexchange.com
5
votes
Every SQL statement has to be reviewed by a DBA -- common?
I've never worked in an environment like that, I'm sure I would hate it. A thought comes to mind to start keeping track of some metrics around this...
How much time does a dev spend pulling sql out …
- 250