Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with paradigms
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 935
A fundamental style of computer programming.
21
votes
What's your strongest opinion against functional programming?
I think that the reason functional programming isn't used very widely is because it gets in your way too much. It's hard to take a serious look at, for example, Lisp or Haskell, without saying "this …
- 83k
5
votes
Modern OOP vs Alan Kays OOP
First off, "modern OOP" is not a deviation from Alan Kay's OOP. Kay may have coined the term itself, but Smalltalk-style "OOP" is a significant deviation from actual class-and-object programming as i …
- 83k